Administrators don't always like change from the traditional way to do research compliance and administration. They don't like taking risks and believe things are working just fine as is. Also, they’re accustomed to traditional research compliance methods and don't have much pressure to change. On the other hand, with the knowledge that their department could become much more efficient and productive, they might have a change of heart.
Experienced grant writers understand that the market for research grants is competitive. This can often seem like your department is missing out on thousands of potential dollars perfectly suited to your research goals. However, the strength of an application is not the only factor in earning funding. In fact, we'll cover a few vital tips for increasing your research grant opportunities. As a result, you'll ensure that your department... Read More
In today's business environment, soft skills like self-awareness, communication, and empathy are increasingly valuable. It is said that emotional intelligence is more important than IQ. As personal assets go, emotional intelligence--or EQ--is just as marketable as education, experience, and drive. But is emotional intelligence something that can be acquired or is it simply inherent? And how can staff members use it to create a... Read More
Getting a new research compliance software system can definitely pose challenges. But many tend to overlook the problems that can arise post-implementation, especially in the training phase. Despite the fact these systems are an essential part of a needed digital transformation for IRB, researchers, and IACUC committees, the training can be a sticking point for users. Many become frustrated early in the training... Read More
New researchers frequently ask, “What does the Institutional Review Board process look like?” While every research proposal is different, the review process generally includes:
- An initial administrative screening where the IRB administrator checks that all parts of the proposal are uploaded and complete (e.g., consent form, recruitment script, etc.).
- A revision step where the Primary Investigator (PI) is contacted and asked to upload any missing parts or address any suggested edits.
- A formal review process where reviewers examine... Read More
The effort to modernize old processes tends to be met with a lot of reticence in most organizations, regardless of size. Traditionally, organizations have remained steadfast in their decades-old systems. It might prove difficult to convince others to give up their paper-based processes in favor of a new online research compliance system. Researchers, IRB, and IACUC committees and their staff are mired in paper-based clerical functions, and an online compliance system can be an incredibly powerful tool... Read More
Adopting research compliance software, especially an online IRB system, as a small or mid-sized organization might seem like an overwhelming challenge. When considering the number of resources it takes to implement, train and onboard, as well as time, it might not seem like a worthy investment. However, Axiom’s Mentor system provides a host of benefits that can greatly contribute to increasing speed, efficiency, and overall convenience for your compliance office. Mentor IRB can become the... Read More
In many disciplines, funding agencies are expecting researchers to share their research data as a part of their research practice. While data sharing has benefits and can mobilize continued research, researchers are legally and ethically obligated to prevent accidental disclosure of sensitive information. Researchers’ attitudes towards sharing data may vary. It is important to understand the process of data sharing and develop a thoughtful plan describing how and why to share data. The following... Read More
It’s a new year and a fresh start to research in 2018. New researchers are beginning their IRB protocols and it is important for them to know the difference between four key terms associated with data collection: Anonymous,Confidential, De-identified, and Identifiable. Below are some examples of these key terms. Data in the following examples is used generally and can include numeric data (e.g., surveys) and qualitative materials (e.g., interview transcripts and field notes).
- Anonymous – Anonymous data is collected in... Read More
A new researcher visited my office in a panicked state and expressed his concern about his upcoming study. He was already trained to conduct human subject research and IRB approved to conduct his study, but in his words, he did not “feel ready” to collect the data. His experiences reminded me of the first time I collected data as a master’s student. I collected and analyzed hundreds of personally archived historic letters exchanged between community leaders... Read More